View
Point column special to the Examiner, by Lester S. Rosen
(Published in the Career Section of the Sunday San Francisco Examiner/Chronicle,
April 26, 1998, page J-2)
Employers
are increasingly turning to background screenings of job applicants
as a way of minimizing legal and financial exposure. Concerns about
workplace violence, negligent-hiring lawsuits, wrongful termination
and other problems are leading many employers to be more careful about
who is hired in the first place.
For
applicants, however, background screening can create an uneasy feeling
that they are mistrusted from the start or that Big Brother is watching.
The
fact is, however, that background screenings of job applicants benefit
employers and employees alike. And with the recent changes in the Federal
Fair Credit Reporting Act, job applicants have a great deal of legal
protection.
For
applicants, the advantages of working for a company that requires screening
is that efforts have been made to ensure that co-workers have the qualifications
and credentials they say they have. In addition, employers typically
screen for criminal records, especially those involving violence or
dishonesty.
For
the employer, screening saves the time and money wasted in recruiting,
hiring and training the wrong candidates and eliminates potential difficulties
in the work force.
Of
course, a background screening is not a full-fledged FBI-type investigation.
Screening companies are typically looking for red flags indicating potential
problems or resumes that are not factual or omit important information.
Job
applicants have recently been afforded substantial new legal rights
to ensure the accuracy and fairness of the process. Congress amended
the Fair Credit Reporting Act effective last September 30 to allow consumers
to know exactly what is going on and to assert their rights in case
of errors or mistakes. An applicant’s rights are listed in detail on
the Federal Trade Commission Web site at www.ftc.gov.
Under
the FCRA, when an employers uses a background screening company to prepare
a report, several steps must occur:
- The employer
must clearly disclose to the applicant in a separate document that
a report is being prepared. The disclosure can no longer be buried
in an application in the fine print.
- A signed release
is required before checking records such as criminal convictions or
pending criminal cases, driving records, credit reports or educational
credentials.
- An additional
notice is required when a background firm checks references, such
as asking previous employers about job performance.
- If an employer
intends to deny employment based upon information in the report, the
job applicant must receive a copy of the report and a notice of legal
rights.
- If an applicant
believes the information is wrong, the applicant can inform the screening
agency, which must remove or correct inaccurate or unverified information,
usually within 30 days.
- Applicants have
the right to inspect their files.
The
law is designed to strike a balance between an employer’s need to exercise
due diligence in hiring and an applicant’s right of accuracy and privacy.
For applicants who are genuinely the victims of mistaken identity or
bureaucratic errors, there is an opportunity to know what is being said
about them and to fix the record so they are not denied opportunities
unfairly.
For
a job applicant, honesty is always the best policy. Negative information
honestly disclosed in an interview with an explanation may well have
no effect. However, if the employer discovers it through a third party,
then the lack of honesty may be the reason for not getting the position.
Even
a criminal conviction cannot legally automatically disqualify a person
from employment, without considering the nature of the offense, when
it occurred, what the applicant has done since and whether it is related
to job performance.
Lester
S. Rosen is president of Employment Screening Resources in San Rafael,
a pre-employment and credentials verification firm. He can be reached
at lsr@esrcheck.com, or at (415)
472-7788.