According to a report from the Associated Press (AP), a Minneapolis, Minnesota-based Consumer Reporting Agency (CRA) that performs employment screening for businesses will close two offices in South Dakota by the end of the year and move those jobs to new sites in Arizona, India, and the Philippines. The AP reports that the company, one of the largest background screening suppliers in the country, says the closings in Aberdeen, South Dakota and Mitchell, South Dakota are due to restructuring and will affect approximately 140 workers. The AP story is the latest case of a large U.S. background screening company “offshoring” the processing of background checks to foreign countries.
However, along with the cheaper production and labor costs and increased profits for CRAs that engage in offshoring, the practice potentially has negative side effects for both employers and consumers, according to a white paper recently released by Employment Screening Resources (ESR) on the subject titled ‘The Dangers of Offshoring Personally Identifiable Information (PII) Outside of United States’:
When a United States resident applies for a job, they are likely to undergo a pre-employment background check. A disclosure and consent form required by law is completed by the applicant where they provide among other things their name, date of birth, and Social Security number (“SSN”) — in other words, everything needed for identity theft. What job applicants do not know is that with some CRAs there is a substantial likelihood that their Personally Identifiable Information (“PII”) will end up outside the U.S. and its territories in a foreign call center or data processing location well beyond the protection of U.S. privacy laws through the process known as “offshoring” The practice of offshoring provides virtually no protection against identity theft.
It is not relevant where a firm’s servers are located. If an offshore worker is able to access PII, then the potential for Identity Theft exists. Nor is the formal legal relationship between the U.S. firm and the offshore worker relevant in the least. It does not matter if the offshore worker is an employee of the American firm, an employee of some legal subsidiary, an employee of a firm hired by the U.S. firm, or an independent contractor — once data goes offshore, U.S. legal protections vanish and there is strong historic evidence that there is a risk of identity theft.
The white paper details the following negative side effects of offshoring PII outside the country:
- Once PII goes offshore, it is beyond the protections if U.S. privacy laws. An American who is the victim of identity theft as a result of offshoring cannot as a practical matter call foreign Police Departments and expect help.
- Regardless of whether the information remains on the servers of the U.S. firm and is accessed abroad, or whether the foreign workers are technically on the payroll of the U.S. firm or a subsidiary, the problem is that a worker outside of the U.S. has access to PII.
- Offshoring Information Technology (IT) jobs abroad can increase security risks. A survey of 350 IT Managers quoted in Security Management Magazine found that 69 percent of respondents said they thought outsourcing decreased network security while 61 percent said their company had experienced a data breach.
- The American Transcription Association (ATA) is against the offshoring of transcription to workers outside of the United States because sending personal information outside of the country can lead to unsecured transfer of personal data and offshoring work also means U.S.-based transcriptionists are losing jobs.
- Sensitive medical information can be compromised. For example, a California hospital outsourced its medical transcribing and the work ended up in Pakistan. A medical transcriber in Pakistan embroiled in a dispute with her employer about wages threatened to publish the medical records of thousands of Americans on the Internet. Needless to say, the hospital suffered a great deal of negative publicity and the confidentially of medical records for many Americans was endangered.
Personally Identifiable Information, as defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB), is any data used for distinguishing individual identity and may include:
- Full name
- Birthday and birthplace
- Social Security Number (SSN)
- Vehicle registration plate number
- Driver’s license number
- Credit card number
- National identification number
To alert employers and job seekers about the potential dangers caused by background check firms offshoring PII, a group of more than 170 like-minded Consumer Reporting Agencies formed the industry group ‘ConcernedCRAs’ that endorses and subscribes to a set of standards that opposes the processing of consumer reports outside of the United States. For more information, visit http://www.concernedcras.com/no_offshoring.htm.
As a member of ConcernedCRAs, Employment Screening Resources (ESR) does not offshore PII and all processing and preparation of background checks are performed exclusively in the United States, with the only exception being international verification using information outside the country. ESR was also the third background screening firm in the U.S. to become “Safe Harbor” Certified for data privacy protection.
The Associated Press story ‘MN company closing 2 offices in South Dakota’ is available at http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505245_162-57423199/mn-company-closing-2-offices-in-south-dakota/. The complimentary white paper ‘The Dangers of Offshoring Personally Identifiable Information (PII) Outside of United States’ from Employment Screening Resources (ESR) is available at http://www.ESRcheck.com/Download/.
For more information about the practice of offshoring, read ESR News blogs tagged ‘offshoring’ at http://www.esrcheck.com/wordpress/tag/offshoring/. Next week, ESR News will feature a blog about another large U.S. background screening company that recently expanded its offshoring practices.
For more information about Employment Screening Resources (ESR) – ‘The Background Check Authority’ and nationwide background screening company accredited by The National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) – visit http://www.esrcheck.com/ or call 415.898.0044.
About Employment Screening Resources (ESR):
Employment Screening Resources (ESR) – ‘The Background Check AuthoritySM’– provides accurate and actionable information, empowering employers to make informed safe hiring decisions for the benefit for our clients, their employees, and the public. ESR literally wrote the book on background screening with “The Safe Hiring Manual” by Founder and CEO Lester Rosen. ESR is accredited by The National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS), a distinction held by a small percentage of screening firms. By choosing an accredited screening firm like ESR, employers know they have selected an agency that meets the highest industry standards. For more information about Employment Screening Resources (ESR), visit http://www.esrcheck.com/ or call 415.898.0044 or 888.999.4474.
About ESR News:
The Employment Screening Resources (ESR) News blog – ESR News – provides employment screening information for employers, recruiters, and jobseekers on a variety of topics including credit reports, criminal records, data privacy, discrimination, E-Verify, jobs reports, legal updates, negligent hiring, workplace violence, and use of search engines and social network sites for background checks. For more information about ESR News or to send comments or questions, please email ESR News Editor Thomas Ahearn at email@example.com.