Ending a two year dispute, Kaplan Higher Learning Education Corp. has won a summary judgment in a nationwide hiring discrimination lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) over Kaplan’s use of credit checks as part of its hiring process that the EEOC alleged violated Title VII due to an unlawful “disparate impact” on Black applicants. The full summary judgment in the case of EEOC vs. Kaplan is available at http://www.esrcheck.com/file/EEOCvsKaplan_SummaryJudgment.pdf.
The plaintiff EEOC – the agency that enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination – brought this lawsuit against defendants Kaplan Higher Education Corporation (“KHEC”), Kaplan, Inc. (“KI”), and Iowa College Acquisition Corporation d/b/a/ Kaplan University (“KU”). The suit alleged that Kaplan’s use of credit history in making hiring decisions violated certain provisions of Title VII [42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1), (a)(2) and (k)] since the practice had a disparate impact on Black applicants.
The EEOC offered the testimony and report of their expert to support its position that Kaplan’s use of credit reports disparately impacted Black applicants in violation of Title VII. Kaplan moved to exclude the expert’s testimony and report on the grounds that the method of determining race was scientifically unsound, the sample used was not representative of the applicant pool, and the analysis failed to account for non-discriminatory variables that could account for any disparate impact.
In the summary judgment, U.S. District Judge Patricia A. Gaughan found that the “race rating” system used by the EEOC’s expert to assess the effect Kaplan’s credit report check system had on minority applications was not scientifically sound enough to produce admissible results. Judge Gaughan wrote:
Because plaintiff fails to present admissible evidence showing that the use of credit reports “caused the exclusion of applicants…because of their membership in a protected group,” plaintiff cannot set forth a prima facie case of disparate impact discrimination. As such, summary judgment in favor of defendants is warranted and the Court will not reach defendants’ alternative arguments, i.e., job relatedness, business necessity, and estoppel.
In December of 2010, the EEOC filed a nationwide hiring discrimination lawsuit against Kaplan Higher Education Corp., a nationwide provider of postsecondary education, charging that the company engaged in a pattern or practice of unlawful discrimination by refusing to hire a class of black job applicants. The suit also alleged that Kaplan’s use of credit histories of job applicants discriminated due to race. The EEOC press release about the lawsuit is at http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/12-21-10a.cfm.
Employment Screening Resources (ESR) – ‘The Background Check Authority’ – is a nationwide background screening provider accredited by The National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®). For more information about background checks from ESR, visit http://www.esrcheck.com, call Toll Free 888.999.4474, or email firstname.lastname@example.org.
About Employment Screening Resources (ESR):
Founded by safe hiring expert Attorney Les Rosen in 1997, Employment Screening Resources (ESR) – ‘The Background Check AuthoritySM’– provides accurate and actionable information that empowers employers to make informed hiring decisions for the benefit of their organizations, employees, and the public. CEO Rosen literally wrote the book on background checks with “The Safe Hiring Manual” and ESR is accredited by The National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS), a distinction held by a small percent of screening firms. Employers choosing ESR know they have selected an agency meeting the highest industry standards. To learn more about ESR, visit http://www.esrcheck.com or call toll free 888.999.4474.
About ESR News:
The Employment Screening Resources (ESR) News blog – ESR News – provides employment screening information for employers, recruiters, and jobseekers on a variety of topics including credit reports, criminal records, data privacy, discrimination, E-Verify, jobs reports, legal updates, negligent hiring, workplace violence, and use of search engines and social network sites for background checks. For more information about ESR News or to send comments or questions, please email ESR News Editor Thomas Ahearn at email@example.com. To subscribe to the ESR News Blog Feed, visit http://www.esrcheck.com/wordpress/feed/. To subscribe to the complimentary ESRcheck Report monthly newsletter, please visit http://www.esrcheck.com/Newsletter/.