Tag Archives: credit reports

Job Applicants Need to Learn about Credit Report Checks for Employment Screening when Looking for Work

Since a 2010 survey released by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) – ‘Background Checking: Conducting Credit Background Checks’ – found that 13 percent of the companies surveyed checked the credit reports of all job candidates while 47 percent checked the credit reports of some job candidates, many job seekers looking for work are wondering if their bad credit will affect the outcome of their job search. These jobs seekers need to know that there are limits to what employers can see in employment-related credit checks and how they can use that credit information, according to the article ‘Can Bad Credit Ruin Your Job Search?’ by Susan Johnston on Bankrate.com. Continue reading

Maryland Latest US State to Place Restrictions on Use of Credit Checks by Employers

Joining four other U.S. states – Hawaii, Illinois, Oregon, and Washington – prohibiting the use of credit information by employers, Maryland has enacted new legislation placing restrictions on so-called credit checks by employers that use the credit report or credit history of job applicants or employees for employment decisions. The law, known as the ‘Job Applicant Fairness Act,’ was signed by Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley in April of 2011 and will take effect on October 1, 2011. Continue reading

Many US States Considering Bills Limiting Use of Credit Reports for Employment Screening Background Checks

While only four U.S. states – Hawaii, Oregon, Washington, and most recently Illinois – currently have laws limiting or prohibiting credit checks by employers on job applicants and employees, lawmakers in many U.S. states are currently proposing legislation restricting the use of credit reports for employment screening background checks.

In all, lawmakers in 18 U.S. states are considering bills that limit the use of credit report data for employment screening. These states include: California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Vermont. Continue reading

Maryland Legislation Would Limit Credit Checks by Employers on Job Applicants

State lawmakers in Maryland have proposed legislation that would limit the ability of employers to run credit checks using credit reports and credit histories of employees and job applicants for employment purposes in response to complaints from job seekers in the state who said they were denied jobs after their would-be employers learned about their low credit scores, according to an article in The Baltimore Sun. Continue reading

Survey Reveals More than Half of Consumers Want to Ban Credit Report Checks by Employers

More than half of consumers approve of the idea of banning the use of job applicant credit reports by employers for employment screening, according to a recent survey.

A telephone poll survey conducted for Credit.com by GfK Custom Research North America from January 14, 2011 to January 16, 2011 interviewed 1,004 consumers about:

Employers have the right, with your permission, to check your credit report as part of background screening for employment. A number of lawmakers are interested in banning this practice – do you… Continue reading

Colorado Bill Would Severely Limit Use of Credit Reports in Employment Screening

A proposed Colorado law would restrict the use of credit reports of job applicants by employers to certain situations, and make employers that use the information adversely indicate what information they relied upon in the credit report to make their decision. Continue reading

Three Credit Report Resellers Settle FTC Charges for Not Protecting Personal Information of Consumers

By Lester Rosen, Employment Screening Resources (ESR) President & Thomas Ahearn, ESR News Editor

In the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) first cases against credit report resellers for the data security failures of their clients, three companies that resell credit reports of consumers have agreed to settle FTC charges that they did not take reasonable steps to protect personal information of consumers and allowed computer hackers to access that personal information, according to a recent news release from the FTC.

Administrative complaints issued by the FTC showed the three credit report resellers bought credit reports from the three nationwide consumer reporting agencies – Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion – and added them to reports to sell to determine eligibility for credit of consumers. Because these three resellers allegedly allowed clients to access these reports without basic security measures such as firewalls and updated antivirus software, hackers accessed more than 1,800 credit reports without authorization through the computer networks of clients. The three credit report resellers also allegedly did not make reasonable efforts to protect against future security even after becoming aware of these data breaches.

The three credit report resellers are charged with violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by:

  • Failing to protect their internet portals and thereby furnishing credit reports to hackers who lacked a permissible purpose to have them,
  • Failing to maintain reasonable procedures to limit the furnishing of credit reports for such purposes, and
  • Furnishing credit reports when they had reasonable grounds for believing the reports would not be used for a permissible purpose.

The failure of the three credit report resellers to protect personal information of consumers also allegedly violated the FCRA. In addition, the credit report resellers allegedly violated the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Safeguards Rule by failing to:

  • Design and implement information safeguards to control the risks to consumer information;
  • Regularly test or monitor the effectiveness of their controls and procedures; to evaluate and adjust their information security programs in light of known or identified risks; and
  • Have comprehensive information security programs.

The proposed settlement, part of the ongoing campaign of the FTC to protect the personal information of consumers, would require the three credit report resellers to:

  • Have comprehensive information security programs designed to protect the security, confidentiality, and integrity of the personal information of consumers, including information accessible to clients;
  • Obtain independent audits of their security programs, every other year for 20 years;
  • Furnish credit reports only to those with a permissible purpose; and
  • Maintain reasonable procedures to limit the furnishing of credit reports to those with a permissible purpose.

These cases show that the FTC will call for imposition of civil penalties against resellers of consumer reports who do not take adequate measures to fulfill their obligations to protect information contained in consumer reports as required by the FCRA. These cases also send a strong message that companies giving their clients online access to sensitive information of consumers must have reasonable procedures to secure that information.

Consumer protection through data security makes up a critical part of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS) accreditation process. Since its founding in 2003, the NAPBS has believed that there is a strong need for a singular cohesive industry standard and created the Background Screening Agency Accreditation Program (BSAAP). Governed by a strict professional standard composed of requirements and measurements, the BSAAP is becoming a widely recognized seal of approval that brings national recognition to background screening organizations – also referred to as Consumer Reporting Agencies (CRAs) – that will stand as the industry “seal” representing a background screening organization’s commitment to excellence, accountability, high professional standards, and continued improvement.

The NAPBS Background Screening Credentialing Council (BSCC) oversees the application process and is the governing accreditation body that will ensure the background screening organizations seeking accreditation meet or exceed a measurable standard of competence. To become accredited, a CRA must pass an onsite audit of its policies and procedures as they relate to six critical areas of the BSAAP:

  • ‘Section 1: Consumer Protection’ includes standards for: Information Security Policy; Data Security; Intrusion, Detection and Response; Stored Data Security; Password Protocol; Electronic Access Control; Physical Security; Consumer Information Privacy Policy; Unauthorized Browsing; Record Destruction; Consumer Disputes; Sensitive Data Masking; and Database Criminal Records.
  • ‘Section 2: Legal Compliance’ includes standards for: Designated Compliance Person(s); State Consumer Reporting Laws; Driver Privacy Protection Act (DPPA); State Implemented DPPA Compliance; Integrity; Prescribed Notices; and Certification from Client.
  • ‘Section 3: Client Education’ includes standards for: Client Legal Responsibilities; Client Required Documents; Truth in Advertising; Adverse Action; Legal Counsel; Understanding Consumer Reports; and Information Protection.
  • ‘Section 4: Product Standards’ includes standards for: Public Record Researcher Agreement; Vetting Requirement; Public Record Researcher Certification; Errors and Omissions Coverage; Information Security; Auditing Procedures; Identification Confirmation; and Jurisdictional Knowledge.
  • ‘Section 5: Service Standards’ includes standards for: Verification Accuracy; Current Employment; Diploma Mills; Procedural Disclosures; Verification Databases; Use of Stored Data; Documentation of Verification Attempts; Outsourced Verification Services; Conflicting Data; Professional Conduct; and Authorized Recipient.
  • ‘Section 6: General Business Practices’ includes standards for: Character; Insurance; Client Credentialing; Vendor Credentialing; Consumer Credentialing; Document Management; Employee Certification; Worker Training; Visitor Security; Employee Criminal History; Quality Assurance; and Certification.

Employment Screening Resources (ESR) is formally recognized as accredited by the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS) Background Screening Credentialing Council (BSCC) for successfully proving compliance with the Background Screening Agency Accreditation Program (BSAAP). For more information, visit Employment Screening Resources (ESR) at http://www.ESRcheck.com

Source:
http://ftc.gov/opa/2011/02/settlement.shtm

Use of Credit Reports and Criminal Records for Employment Screening comes under Scrutiny

By Thomas Ahearn, Employment Screening Resources (ESR) News Editor

An article in the February 2011 issue of the Society for Human Resource Management’s (SHRM) HR Magazine‘Close Up On Screening’ – describes how employers are scrambling to adjust to changes in the myriad of state and federal laws that govern pre-employment background screening due to increased scrutiny by legislators and policy enforcers on the use of credit reports and criminal records in hiring decisions.

For examples, Illinois recently became the fourth state — after Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington — to restrict the use of credit histories in hiring decisions, while Massachusetts became the second state, in addition to Hawaii, to prohibit private employers from asking about criminal records of job applicants on initial written job applications.

However, contrary to public opinion, a 2010 survey from SHRM – ‘Conducting Credit Background Checks’ – showed credit histories were used sparingly and wisely in hiring decisions.

“The perception that employers are ordering massive amounts of credit reports is nothing like the truth,” said Lester Rosen, President of San Francisco-area background check provider Employment Screening Resources (ESR), who was quoted in the HR Magazine article.

According to the SHRM survey on credit background checks, when respondents were asked if their organization or an agency hired by their organization conducted credit background checks for any job candidates by reviewing their credit reports:

  • 47 percent responded they performed credit background checks on selected job candidates.
  • 40 percent responded they did not perform credit background checks on any job candidates.
  • 13 percent responded they performed credit background checks on all job candidates.

Regarding which categories of job candidates that organizations conducted credit background checks on, the SHRM survey revealed that 91 percent of “job candidates for positions with fiduciary and financial responsibility” underwent credit background checks.

As for restrictions on criminal records, the SHRM article indicates at least two dozen cities and counties and five states have narrowed questions on their job applications to cover only felony convictions or have stopped asking about criminal history entirely and have “banned the box,” a reference to removing the boxes on applications that job applicants must check if they have even been convicted of a crime. 

“With ‘ban the box’, applicants can be considered without pre-judging,” said Rosen, the author of ‘The Safe Hiring Manual – The Complete Guide to Keeping Criminals, Terrorists, and Imposters Out of Your Workplace,’ a comprehensive guide to background checks. “From a government point of view, it makes sense to get people back to work and to avoid the extra costs of social services. Private employers prefer to ask upfront.”

Furthermore, while employers conduct criminal background checks to guarantee safety in the workplace and to avoid negligent hiring lawsuits, they may attract attention from the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) if they are not careful in doing so. The article noted that while procedural consistency is important throughout an organization, criteria consistency is important within job groups.

“Not all janitors are background screened the way you screen accountants, but janitors should be screened consistently with janitors,” Rosen explained in the article. “Employers get in trouble when they engage in automated decision-making. There always should be a human review to make sure you’re making the right decision.”

Rosen added that while many employers know the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) contains procedures for conducting credit background checks, some are unaware the FCRA also covers criminal background checks and offers specific “adverse action” procedures an employer must follow if a background check results in a denial of employment for a job applicant.

As a result, many employers are turning to an outsourced background screening and safe hiring partner to establish protocols and consistent practices while also helping to eliminate inappropriate use of screening results.

“A good background-screening partner makes sure the employer is in compliance with the act and other laws, abides by adverse action rules, conducts consistent checks within job groups, and follows EEOC guidelines for using criminal reports,” Rosen said.

To learn more about background checks, visit the Employment Screening Resources (ESR) website at http://www.ESRcheck.com and read more about ‘credit reports’ and ‘criminal records’ on the ESR News Blog

Founded in 1996 in the San Francisco area, Employment Screening Resources (ESR) wrote the book on background checks with ‘The Safe Hiring Manual’ by ESR founder and President Lester Rosen and is accredited by The National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) . To learn more about Employment Screening Resources, visit http://www.ESRcheck.com or contact Jared Callahan, ESR Director of Client Relations, at 415.898.0044 or jcallahan@ESRcheck.com.

Sources:
http://www.shrm.org/Publications/hrmagazine/EditorialContent/2011/0211/Pages/0211roberts.aspx
http://www.shrm.org/Research/SurveyFindings/Articles/Pages/BackgroundChecking.aspx

Bill Limiting Credit Checks of Job Applicants for Employment Screening Reintroduced in Congress

A bill that would limit the use of credit checks of job applicants in employment screening has been reintroduced into Congress by U.S. Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN).

As originally written, the ‘Equal Employment for All Act’ would amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) to prohibit the use of consumer credit checks against prospective employees and existing employees as a means of making adverse employment decisions, with an exception for employers seeking applicants in national security or positions with major financial responsibilities.

Congressman Cohen – who wrote the same bill in the last Congress but it was never voted on – noted in a news report that the recession has led some job applicants into debt and credit checks can keep them unemployed. He also noted the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has suggested such use of credit checks may affect women and minorities disproportionately.

A 2010 survey from the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) on the use of credit reports for employment screening revealed that:

  • 13 percent of employers surveyed conducted credit checks on all job candidates.
  • 40 percent of employers did not conduct any credit checks on job candidates.
  • 47 percent of employers considered credit checks for candidates of selected jobs.
  • 60 percent of employers overall ran credit checks on at least some applicants.

Credit checks for employment purposes have become a very controversial subject. Job applicants looking for work in a tough economy are caught in a classic “Catch-22” situation where they have bad credit because they cannot get a job but cannot get a job because they have bad credit.

Employment Screening Resources (ESR), a leading provider of background checks accredited by the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS), believes credit checks are just one of many factors – including education, experience, references, and past criminal history – that employers use to find qualified job applicants, employers should approach with caution when using them for employment screening, and articulate a clear rationale as to why a credit check is related to a particular job. Employers should also be aware of the potential for errors in credit reports.

The question of whether use of credit checks in employment screening is discriminatory is so controversial that the use of credit reports for employment screening is the number one background screening trend for 2011 as chosen by Employment Screening Resources founder and President Lester Rosen. For a list of all trends in ESR’s ‘Top Ten Trends in Employment Screening’ for 2011, visit: http://www.esrcheck.com/Top-Ten-Trends-In-Background-Screening-2011.php.

For more information about credit background checks, visit Employment Screening Resources (ESR) at http://www.ESRcheck.com.

Founded in 1996 in the San Francisco area, Employment Screening Resources (ESR) wrote the book on background checks with ‘The Safe Hiring Manual’ by ESR founder and President Lester Rosen and is accredited by The National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) . To learn more about Employment Screening Resources, visit http://www.ESRcheck.com or contact Jared Callahan, ESR Director of Client Relations, at 415.898.0044 or jcallahan@ESRcheck.com.

Sources:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-3149
http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2011/jan/20/credit-check-bill-is-refiled/

Employment Screening Resources Releases Fourth Annual List of Background Check Developments

Employment Screening Resources (ESR) – a nationwide background check provider to employers accredited by the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) – has released its ‘Fourth Annual Top Ten Trends in Background Screening for 2011’ as predicted by ESR founder, President, and safe hiring expert Lester Rosen.

“For the fourth consecutive year, Employment Screening Resources has identified new trends that are starting to make a difference as the employment background screening industry matures,” explains Rosen, an Attorney at Law and author of ‘The Safe Hiring Manual,’ the first comprehensive guide for employment background checks. “For the second year in a row, the number one trend on the list is the increased focus on whether the use of credit reports by employers during employment screening is discriminatory.”

An article detailing each individual trend was published on the Employment Screening Resources website in ascending order beginning in December 2010. Below is a complete listing of the ESR ‘Fourth Annual Top Ten Trends in Background Screening for 2011’:

Rosen, a frequent speaker on safe hiring issues, selected each trend after closely reviewing background screening news and developments from various sources, a practice that helped him predict future background screening industry trends in the past.

For a related article, visit: http://www.esrcheck.com/wordpress/2011/01/13/controversial-and-discriminatory-use-of-job-applicant-credit-reports-by-employers-tops-background-screening-trends-list-for-2011/.

For more information on background screening or to purchase background checks, visit Employment Screening Resources (ESR) at http://www.ESRcheck.com.

Founded in 1996 in the San Francisco area, Employment Screening Resources (ESR) wrote the book on background checks with ‘The Safe Hiring Manual’ by ESR founder and President Lester Rosen and is accredited by The National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) . To learn more about Employment Screening Resources, visit http://www.ESRcheck.com or contact Jared Callahan, ESR Director of Client Relations, at 415.898.0044 or jcallahan@ESRcheck.com.