HOME   |   CLIENT LOGIN   |   SEARCH   |   CONTACT US

EMPLOYMENT SCREENING RESOURCES (ESR) NEWS

Posts Tagged ‘ex-offenders’

California Assembly Bill 1831 would Prohibit Local Governments from Asking about Criminal History on Initial Job Applications

Posted March 2, 2012 — By Tom Ahearn, ESR News Editor

A new piece of California legislature – Assembly Bill No. 1831 (AB 1831) – would prohibit local governments in the state “from inquiring into or considering the criminal history of an applicant or including any inquiry about criminal history on any initial employment application.” AB 1831 would only authorize a local government to consider the criminal history of a job applicant “after the applicant’s qualifications have been screened and the agency has determined the applicant meets the minimum employment requirements as stated in any notice issued for the position.” California Assembly Bill 1831 is available at: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/asm/ab_1801-1850/ab_1831_bill_20120222_introduced.pdf. (more…)

Alleged Killing by Cafe Worker with Criminal Past Demonstrates Need for Small Business to Perform Background Checks

Posted January 31, 2012 — By Tom Ahearn, ESR News Editor

A recent story from The Charlotte Observer about an ex-felon hired to work at a cafe who allegedly killed a pregnant cafe manager by fatally stabbing her during a robbery demonstrates the need for small businesses to perform background checks, as well as the risks taken when hiring employees with criminal records or the exposure to legal liability faced when failing to conduct thorough background checks on job applicants. The Charlotte Observer story ‘Killing puts background checks in spotlight’ is available at: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/01/28/2965684/killing-puts-background-checks.html. (more…)

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Holds Meeting on Use of Criminal Records for Employment Screening Background Checks

Posted July 27, 2011 — By Tom Ahearn, ESR News Editor

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) – the agency of the United States Government that enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination – held a meeting Tuesday, July 26, 2011 focusing on the use of criminal records by employers for employment screening background checks, according to the EEOC press release ‘Striking the Balance Between Workplace Fairness and Workplace Safety.’ At the meeting, the Commission was told by experts that employers refusing to hire people with arrest and conviction records even years after they have completed their sentences may cause recidivism and higher social services costs, but also that businesses face confusing and conflicting laws when using sometimes unreliable arrest and conviction records in making employment decisions. (more…)

New Study on Impact of Past Criminal Record on New Employment Creates More Questions Than it Answers

Posted June 17, 2009 — By Les Rosen, Founder & CEO of ESR
A new study just released by researchers from Carnegie Mellon University has attempted to devise a model to quantify the relevance of a criminal record for employment on the basis that the importance of a past criminal record recedes over time when a person is not re-arrested. The study looks to develop a methodology to measure how much time must pass before an applicant with a criminal record is no greater risk than an applicant without a criminal record. (Blumstein, Nakamura, “Redemption in the Presence of Widespread Criminal Background Checks,” Criminology, Volume 47, Number 2 (2009)).
 
The study, based upon limited data just from the state of New York, found that with time, a person with a criminal record was no greater threat than persons without a criminal record. It suggested that depending upon the offenses included in the study and the age at which the offenses were committed, that after approximately 4½ to 8 years without further arrests, an offender had a minimal risk of re-offending. Of course, the more violent the offense, the longer the time would be required before a person could be considered “redeemed.” Serious crimes such as murder, rape, or child molestation were not part of this particular study, but presumably more serious crimes would have a different result. 
 
Although there is a temptation for the press to take “sound bites” from the findings, it is abundantly clear from the authors of the study themselves that this is only a beginning. The authors were clear that much more study was needed and that there are substantial issues still to be addressed. The author’s characterization that the study represents a “significant step forward in area where so little is known empirically” is well-taken. 
 
The study does not have nearly enough data to reach conclusions from which policy recommendations can be effectively made, has not been reviewed critically by other professionals, and most importantly has a number of drawbacks that can affect its reliability. Many of these limitations were acknowledged by the authors.  There are also unstated assumptions in eh study that would certainly skew any results. 
 
For a more in-depth analysis of why this study cannot be the basis to make policy changes, see a more complete analysis by ESR at: http://www.esrcheck.com/Blumstein-and-Nakamura-study-on-redemption-in-Criminology.php.

US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald Urges Civic Group to Help Reduce Violence in Chicago by helping Ex-offenders to Re-enter Society

Posted May 22, 2009 — By Les Rosen, Founder & CEO of ESR

According to an article posted in today’s Chicago Tribune, U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald says the business community can help reduce violence in Chicago by hiring ex-convicts, since jobs help ex-offenders stay away from the criminal activity that landed them in jail.  http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-ap-il-hiringfelons,0,4186410.story  

Speaking to a Chicago Civic Club, the Mr. Patrick said that many with criminal records want the chance to do something different with their lives and encouraged interested business leaders to talk to other companies that have hired ex-offenders about their experiences. 

The problem for businesses of course is they have the obligation to exercise due diligence in hiring, and if a perosn with an unsuitable criminal record is hired, it can be a legal and financial nightmares, with a dramatic impact on the live of innocent people. 

On the other hand, employers should also not automatically reject an applicant with a criminal record unless there is a business justification.  ESR take the position that there is a job for everyone, but not everyone is suitable for every job. 

The problem of course is complicated by the fact that our society does not want to create a permanent class of unemployable ex-offenders who can never re-enter society and be productive. Automatic rejection of any applicant with a criminal record makes it very difficult for an ex-offender to get back into the workforce. Given that, on the average, it costs over $30,000 a year to incarcerate a prisoner in the United States, and that without a job it is very difficult for an ex-offender to become a law abiding tax paying citizen, it is critical that society gives everyone an opportunity to work. Unless ex-offenders can get a second chance, our society will spend more time and resources building prisons instead of schools, hospitals and roads. This is a difficult issue facing society.  For more information, see a previous ESR blog at http://www.esrcheck.com/wordpress/?p=285

 

Â